Writing Wiki

The writing wiki is here: http://writcom.wetpaint.com

College Writer Chapter Summaries -- David C.

http://www.freemindshare.com/map/fmnr8ACSUW/

Freemindshare Maps

Carmen's map of Chapter 10:
http://www.freemindshare.com/map/lmvw146EIX/

Organization Pattern s

Two Types of Analytical Papers

	Scientific	Humanistic
Epistemology	Discover the truth	Create meaning
Human Nature	Determinism	Free will
Value Priority	Objectivity	Emancipation
Purpose of Theory	Give universal laws	Give rules for interpretation
Research Methods	Experiment and Survey	Textual analysis and ethnography
Standards for Evaluation	Explanation of data Prediction of future Relative simplicity Testable hypotheses Practical utility	Understanding of people Clarification of values Aesthetic appeal Community of agreement Reform society

Writing Skills -- ISTEP

Writing Skills and the ISTEP+ Test (Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress)

In its listing of writing skills the ISTEP+ test focuses on the writer's ability to:
(words in parentheses indicate highest level of proficiency)
a) stay (completely) focused on topic and task
b) organize ideas (logically)
c) exhibit (exceptional) word usage
d) demonstrate (exceptional) writing technique
e) (effectively) adjust language and tone to task and reader


More specifically, the good writer must:
Ideas
a) unify theme or main idea
b) not go off on tangents
c) fully accomplish the task (summary, essay, article...)
d) fully explore many facets of the topic

Organization
a) create a cohesive, meaningful whole (i.e. introduction, body, and conclusion)
b) progress in an order that enhances meaning
c) make smooth transitions between ideas, sentences and paragraphs to enhance meaning of text

Style
a) choose vocabulary to make explanations detailed and precise, descriptions rich, and actions clear and vivid
b) demonstrate control of a challenging vocabulary
c) use varied sentence patterns and complex sentences (yet fluent and easy to read)
d) uses writer's techniques (i.e. literary conventions such as imagery, humor etc.)

Voice
a) choose appropriate register (i.e. formal, personal, or dialect) to suit task
b) display a strong sense of audience (the readers)
c) have a unique perspective; may be original, authoritative, lively and/or exciting

Mechanics
a)words should have no or few capitalization errors
b) sentences should have no or few punctuation errors
c) words should have no or few spelling errors
d) sentences should have no or few grammar or word usage errors
e) good writing has no or few paragraphing errors
f) good writing has no or few run-on sentences or sentence fragments

Process Topics

How to care for a cat (or any animal).
How to spend a holiday.
How to develop self-control.
How to find happiness.
How to keep your girl (boy) friend.
How to track a wild animal.
How to prepare my favorite dish.
How to cure a cold.
How to take good snapshots.
How to take notes.
How to criticize music.
How to make an ice cream soda.
How to keep friends.
How to spend a weekend.
How to take it easy intelligently.
How to plan a garden.
How to entertain the family.
How to paper a room.
How to be popular.
How to grow tomatoes (or any vegetable, grain, or flower).
How to choose a friend.
How to solve the housing problem.
How to make cheese.
How to make coffee.
How to write a good essay.
How to be a nonchalant when embarrassed.
How to study systematically.
How to prepare for an examination.
How to plan a meal.
How to cure insomnia.
How to get along with a brother (or sister).
How to enjoy music.
How a band moves into a formation.
How to give a gentle hint.
How to leave a party.
How to make an impression on a girl (or a boy).
How to learn a part in a play.
How to administer artificial respiration.
How (not) to prepare for a journey.
How to caddy.
How to review a book.
How to develop film.
How to spend your time profitably while standing in line.
How to clean a rifle.
How to enjoy a vacation.
How to hunt with a camera.
How to sleep in class.
How to approach Dad.
How I would change Present (traffic, food, education) laws.
Learning to ride a course.
Do's and don'ts for basketball fans.
Tinkering with machinery.
Steps in making a garden.
A good party game.
In case of fire . . .
Making something out of nothing.
A complicated play in basketball or football (use diagrams).
Helps for puzzle friends.
How to "psych out" a teacher.
How to play a game.
How to spend an enjoyable evening in . . .
Plan for a garden.
Where automobiles are likely to break down.
The serve in tennis.
Choosing a wardrobe.
Earning one's way.
The best scheme I ever heard of to make money.
Making a hobby profitable.
Miracles nature never thought of.
A good floor plan.
How books are classified in a library.
A chairman's (or speaker's) duties in a group discussion.
How to enjoy literature.
How to converse.
How to tie a shoe.
How to take care of a computer.
How to say "no".

Freemind tutorial link

http://www.geocities.com/shaila_kishore/Freemind

Student Photos

Bloom's Taxonomy of Skills (Revised)

On Narrative and Descriptive Writing

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/narrative.htm

Rhetorical Modes

As a writer, you can begin by asking yourself questions and then answering them. Your answers will bring your subject into focus and provide,you with the material to develop your topic. Here are twenty questions or “thought starters” that present ways of observing or thinking about your topic. Each question generates the type of essay listed in parentheses after the question.

1. What does X mean? (Definition)

2. What are the various features of X? (Description)

3. What are the component parts of X? (Simple Analysis)

4. How is X made or done? (Process Analysis)

5. How should X be made or done? (Directional Analysis)

6. What is the essential function of X? (Functional Analysis)

7. What are the causes of X? (Causal Analysis)

8. What are the consequences of X? (Causal Analysis)

9. What are the types of X? (Classification)

10. How is X like or unlike Y? (Comparison)

11. What is the present status of X? (Comparison)

12. What is the significance of X? (Interpretation)

13. What are the facts about X? (Reportage)

14. How did X happen? (Narration)

15. What kind of person is X? (Characterization/Profile)

16. What is my personal response to X? (Reflection)

17. What is my memory ofX? (Reminiscence)

18. What is the value of X? (Evaluation)

19. What are the essential major points or features of X? (summary)

20. What case can be made for or against X? (Persuasion)

Student Blogs

Alex's blog: http://ozaytsev.blogspot.com/
Patricia's blog: http://onebamamoma.blogspot.com/
Carmen's blog: http://carmen2007ca.blogspot.com/
Deann's blog: http://studywcom.blogspot.com/
David's blog: http://www.flyboymusings.blogspot.com/
Bhim's blog: http://sanubhai2006.blogspot.com/
Shreeshesh's blog: http://www.shreeshesh.blogspot.com/
Kalpana's blog: http://ghl_kalpana.blog.com/
Freddie's blog: http://freddielovesenglish.blogspot.com/
Pratik's blog: http://www.pratikhadka.blogspot.com/
Shreeeshesh's blog: www.shreeshesh.blogspot.com

On Mind Mapping

Wikipedia

Freemind Link

http://freemind.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page Freemind

Week / Dates

Week	Sun	Mon	Tu	W	Th	Fri	Sat
1	26-Aug-07	27-Aug-07	28-Aug-07	29-Aug-07	30-Aug-07	31-Aug-07	1-Sep-07
2	2-Sep-07	3-Sep-07	4-Sep-07	5-Sep-07	6-Sep-07	7-Sep-07	8-Sep-07	Labor day 9/3
3	9-Sep-07	10-Sep-07	11-Sep-07	12-Sep-07	13-Sep-07	14-Sep-07	15-Sep-07	Last add/drop day 9/14
4	16-Sep-07	17-Sep-07	18-Sep-07	19-Sep-07	20-Sep-07	21-Sep-07	22-Sep-07
5	23-Sep-07	24-Sep-07	25-Sep-07	26-Sep-07	27-Sep-07	28-Sep-07	29-Sep-07
6	30-Sep-07	1-Oct-07	2-Oct-07	3-Oct-07	4-Oct-07	5-Oct-07	6-Oct-07
7	7-Oct-07	8-Oct-07	9-Oct-07	10-Oct-07	11-Oct-07	12-Oct-07	13-Oct-07
8	14-Oct-07	15-Oct-07	16-Oct-07	17-Oct-07	18-Oct-07	19-Oct-07	20-Oct-07	Midterms
9	21-Oct-07	22-Oct-07	23-Oct-07	24-Oct-07	25-Oct-07	26-Oct-07	27-Oct-07
10	28-Oct-07	29-Oct-07	30-Oct-07	31-Oct-07	1-Nov-07	2-Nov-07	3-Nov-07
11	4-Nov-07	5-Nov-07	6-Nov-07	7-Nov-07	8-Nov-07	9-Nov-07	10-Nov-07
12	11-Nov-07	12-Nov-07	13-Nov-07	14-Nov-07	15-Nov-07	16-Nov-07	17-Nov-07	Verteran's day holiday 11/12
13	18-Nov-07	19-Nov-07	20-Nov-07	21-Nov-07	22-Nov-07	23-Nov-07	24-Nov-07	Thanksgiving recess 21-25
14	25-Nov-07	26-Nov-07	27-Nov-07	28-Nov-07	29-Nov-07	30-Nov-07	1-Dec-07
15	2-Dec-07	3-Dec-07	4-Dec-07	5-Dec-07	6-Dec-07	7-Dec-07	8-Dec-07
16	9-Dec-07	10-Dec-07	11-Dec-07	12-Dec-07	13-Dec-07	14-Dec-07	15-Dec-07	Finals
17	16-Dec-07	17-Dec-07	18-Dec-07	19-Dec-07	20-Dec-07	21-Dec-07	22-Dec-07	Semester ends

Writing links

Forming Your Thesis Statement
http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/Thesis.html

Opening Your Draft
http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/beginning.html

Developing the Middle
http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/middle.htm

Ending Your Draft
http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/ending.html

Revising Your Voice and Style
http://www.nutsandboltsguide.com/plainstyle.htm

Revising Collaboratively
http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/PeerReviews.html

Using the Writing Center
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~riceowl/

Avoiding Imprecise, Misleading, and Biased Words
http://www.bartleby.com/62/

Also, for help with specific word-choice challenges like wordiness, take this quiz.
http://college.hmco.com/cgi-bin/SaCGI.cgi/ace1app.cgi?FNC=AcePresent__Apresent_html___eng_elibrary49

E82 Textbook Online

For English 82A -- Written Communication -- our course textbook, The College Writer, has the following excellent web site:

http://college.hmco.com/english/vandermey/college_writer/1e/students/

E82A Syllabus Fall 2007

WRITTEN COMMUNICATION I

ENGLISH 82A

Units: 3

Prerequisite/Co-requisite Courses: None

Instructor: Dr. Sylvia Y. R. Schoemaker

Phone: 510.628.8036

E-mail: drsylvia2007@gmail.com

Office Hours: T-Th 9-9:30, 12; 15-1 and by arrangement

Required Text:

VanderMey et al. The College Writer. 2nd Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007.

Recommended Texts:

Clouse, Barbara Fine. A Troubleshooting Guide for Writers: Strategies & Process.4th Ed. Boston: Mc-Graw-Hill, 2005.

Adams, Katherine H. and Michael L. Keene, Research and Writing across the Disciples 2nd Ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company, 2000.

Dictionary, thesaurus

(Revision date:9/2007)

DESCRIPTION

English 82A covers the aspects of composing well-organized written communications. The core of the course will emphasize practice in organizing ideas in a clear, logical manner and other elements involved in writing papers in various rhetorical contexts.

COURSE DESCRIPTION (CURRENT UNIVERSITY CATALOG):

ENG 82A 82B - WRITTEN COMMUNICATION I & II

First term: A thorough study of grammar and the fundamentals of composition. Practice in writing themes, book reviews and other short papers is given. Particular attention is directed toward sentence structure, syntax, and general rhetorical principles. Second term: Critical reading and evaluation of selected texts and writings; composition of well-organized expository papers; a careful consideration of methods of research, organization in a clear, logical manner and other elements involved in writing research papers. (3 + 3 units)

OBJECTIVES

You will develop your writing skills for academic, professional, and socio-cultural purposes, in context-centered essay writing. You will learn editing, documentation skills, use of online and other resources

University learner goals 1 -6, and specifically in English:: To develop basic

academic and professional skills (1); To develop the ability to communicate

effective in English, orally and in writing, and to read with understanding

(1.1) and institutional goals , especially 1,(1.1-1.4), 2.4

FORMAT

The course sessions will include presentation, demonstration, discussion, and application modes.

POLICIES

Assignments are to be submitted in a timely manner. Late work will receive reduced points and must be accompanied with a written explanation for its tardiness. Plagiarized work will receive 0 points, and if persistent will result in course failure. All assignments must be typed, include in the top right hand corner your name, course, date submitted, assignment name and revision number.

Attendance is mandatory. Missed classes will constitute 0 points for the day’s class participation points. Excused absences are limited to serious medical or other problems, and are to be explained in writing either before or immediately after the absence. Persistent unexcused absences will result in course failure.

STUDENT RESPONSIBILITIES

Students are expected to attend class, complete assignments, and to participate in individual and group work in a productive manner, and to take personal responsibility for meeting the objectives of the course.

ASSIGNMENTS

Overall Schedule:

For each chapter: summaries, maps, exercises. Three unit essays. Midterm and final with ePortfolios/blogs that include the essays for each unit, notes, reference data, in-class materials, and individual and group assignments. (See Assignments)

	Assignments
	Each chapter contains an Intro, an Overview, Guidelines, and Writing Checklist/Activities. (Summaries, map, and exercises are required for each chapter and both texts by the week scheduled)
1 Intro	I. A Rhetoric: College Student's Guide to Writing
Brief Overview Chapters	I. A Rhetoric: College Student's Guide to Writing Reading, Thinking, Viewing, and Writing 1. Critical Thinking Through Reading, Viewing, and Writing The Writing Process 2. Beginning the Writing Process 3. Planning 4. Drafting 5. Revising 6. Editing and Proofreading 7. Submitting, Writing, and Creating Portfolios The College Essay 8. One Writer's Process
Unit I Weeks 3-5	Narrative, Descriptive, and Reflective Writing
	9. Forms of College Writing Narrative, Descriptive, and Reflective
	10. Narration and Description
	"Mzee Owitti" by Jacqui Nyangi Owitti
	"That Morning on the Prairie" by James C. Schaap
	"A Hanging" by George Orwell
	"Sunday in the Park" by Bel Kaufman
	"Northing" by Annie Dillard
	11. Description and Reflection
	"The Stream in the Ravine" by Nicole Suurdt
	"Call Me Crazy But I Have to Be Myself" by Mary Seymour
	"None of This Is Fair" by Richard Rodriguez
	"Who Shot Johnny?" by Debra Dickerson
Week 5	Unit I (Narrative, Descriptive, and Reflective Writing) Paper Due
Unit II Weeks 6-10	Unit II -- Analytical Writing
	12. Cause and Effect
	"Adrenaline Junkies" by Sarah Hanley
	"The Legacy of Generation N" by Christy Haubegger
	"Our Tired, Our Poor, Our Kids" by Anna Quindlen
	13. Comparison and Contrast
	"A Fear Born of Sorrow" by Anita Brinkman
	"Two Views of the River" by Mark Twain
	"Shrouded in Contradiction" by Gelareh Asayesh
	"Like Mexicans" by Gary Soto
	14. Classification
	"Three Family Cancers" by Kim Brouwer
	"Four Ways to Talk About Literature" by John Van Rys
	"No Wonder They Call Me a Bitch" by Ann Hodgman
	15. Process Writing
	"Wayward Cells" by Kerri Mertz
	"Downloading Photographs from the MC-150 Digital Camera" (from WFB)
	"Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow" by Verne Meyer
	"Campus Racism 101" by Nikki Giovonni
	16. Definition
	"The Gullible Family" by Mary Beth Bruins
	"Understanding Dementia" by Sarah Anne Morelos
	"Deft or Daft" by David Schelhaas
	On Excellence by Cynthia Ozick
Week 10	Unit II (Analytical Writing) Paper Due
Unit III Weeks 11-15	Persuasive Writing
	17. Strategies for Argumentation and Persuasion
	18. Taking a Position
	"An Apology for Ms. Barbie D. Doll" by Rita Isakson
	"In Defense of the Animals" by Meg Greenfield
	"Apostles of Hatred Find It Easy to Spread Their Message" by Leonard Pitts Jr.
	"Pornography" by Margaret Atwood
	"Demystifying Multiculturalism" by Linda Chavez
	19. Persuading Readers to Act
	"To Drill or Not to Drill" by Rebecca Pasok
	"Soul of a Citizen: Living with Conviction in a Cynical Time" by Paul Rogat Loeb
	"I Have a Dream" by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
	"The Media's Image of Arabs" by Jack G. Shaheen
	20. Proposing a Solution
	"Preparing for Agroterror" by Brian Ley
	"Uncle Sam and Aunt Samantha" by Anna Quindlen
	"The Media and the Ethics of Cloning" by Leigh Turner
Week 15	Unit III (Persuasive Writing) Paper Due

STUDENT EVALUATION

Students are evaluated on the basis of class work, written assignments, quizzes, midterm and final exams, with grades proportionate to the following values:

Content	Points	Percent
Attendance & Class Participation	35	15%
Research Journal/Portfolio	50	22%
Quizzes /tests /exercises	50	22%
Papers	60	26%
Presentations	35	15%
Totals	230	100%

Percent	Letter Grade
90-100	A
80-89	B
70-79	C
60-69	D
Below 60	F

Assignments

Each chapter contains an introduction, an overview, guidelines, and writing checklist/activities. For each chapter, write a summary, draw a map of main ideas, subtopics, and significant details, and complete an exercise. You also need to create your own course blog with the following among items to be included on the blog:
1. Summaries for each chapter
2. Maps for each chapter
3. A minimum of one sentence for your thoughts of each day during the semester.

Note: Although you will place these items on your blog, you also need to email all your work to me at-- drsylvia2007@blogspot.com

Unit topics should be selected and outlined for possible development into the unit paper for each of the three units (I: Narrative, Descriptive, and Reflective Writing; II: Analytical; and III: Persuasive).

1 Intro 8-28-9-3	I. A Rhetoric: College Student's Guide to Writing
Brief Overview Chapters	Reading, Thinking, Viewing, and Writing 1. Critical Thinking Through Reading, Viewing, and Writing The Writing Process 2. Beginning the Writing Process 3. Planning 4. Drafting 5. Revising 6. Editing and Proofreading 7. Submitting, Writing, and Creating Portfolios The College Essay 8. One Writer's Process
-------------- Unit I Weeks 3-5	Narrative, Descriptive, and Reflective Writing
9-10-9-24	9. Forms of College Writing Narrative, Descriptive, and Reflective
	10. Narration and Description
	"Mzee Owitti" by Jacqui Nyangi Owitti
	"That Morning on the Prairie" by James C. Schaap
	"A Hanging" by George Orwell
	"Sunday in the Park" by Bel Kaufman
	"Northing" by Annie Dillard
	11. Description and Reflection
	"The Stream in the Ravine" by Nicole Suurdt
	"Call Me Crazy But I Have to Be Myself" by Mary Seymour
	"None of This Is Fair" by Richard Rodriguez
	"Who Shot Johnny?" by Debra Dickerson
Week 5 9-24	Unit I (Narrative, Descriptive, and Reflective Writing) Paper Due
-------------- Unit II Weeks 6-10 10-2-10-30	Unit II -- Analytical Writing
	12. Cause and Effect
	"Adrenaline Junkies" by Sarah Hanley
	"The Legacy of Generation N" by Christy Haubegger
	"Our Tired, Our Poor, Our Kids" by Anna Quindlen
	13. Comparison and Contrast
	"A Fear Born of Sorrow" by Anita Brinkman
	"Two Views of the River" by Mark Twain
	"Shrouded in Contradiction" by Gelareh Asayesh
	"Like Mexicans" by Gary Soto
	14. Classification
	"Three Family Cancers" by Kim Brouwer
	"Four Ways to Talk About Literature" by John Van Rys
	"No Wonder They Call Me a Bitch" by Ann Hodgman
	15. Process Writing
	"Wayward Cells" by Kerri Mertz
	"Downloading Photographs from the MC-150 Digital Camera" (from WFB)
	"Hair Today, Gone Tomorrow" by Verne Meyer
	"Campus Racism 101" by Nikki Giovonni
	16. Definition
	"The Gullible Family" by Mary Beth Bruins
	"Understanding Dementia" by Sarah Anne Morelos
	"Deft or Daft" by David Schelhaas
	On Excellence by Cynthia Ozick
Week 10 10-30	Unit II (Analytical Writing) Paper Due
-------------- Unit III Weeks 11-15	Persuasive Writing
11-6- 12-4	17. Strategies for Argumentation and Persuasion
	18. Taking a Position
	"An Apology for Ms. Barbie D. Doll" by Rita Isakson
	"In Defense of the Animals" by Meg Greenfield
	"Apostles of Hatred Find It Easy to Spread Their Message" by Leonard Pitts Jr.
	"Pornography" by Margaret Atwood
	"Demystifying Multiculturalism" by Linda Chavez
	19. Persuading Readers to Act
	"To Drill or Not to Drill" by Rebecca Pasok
	"Soul of a Citizen: Living with Conviction in a Cynical Time" by Paul Rogat Loeb
	"I Have a Dream" by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
	"The Media's Image of Arabs" by Jack G. Shaheen
	20. Proposing a Solution
	"Preparing for Agroterror" by Brian Ley
	"Uncle Sam and Aunt Samantha" by Anna Quindlen
	"The Media and the Ethics of Cloning" by Leigh Turner
Week 15 12-4	Unit III (Persuasive Writing) Paper Due

Fall 2007 Calendar

Introductory Interview

Introductory Interview (Groups 1 - 4):

Pick a group reporter to introduce and present the information for the group

3 things that are interesting and true about each member of the group

1 thing that is interesting and false about each member of the group

Summary information:

Demographics

Who, what, when, where, why, how

Required Text

The College Writer
VanderMey
Second Edition
ISBN-13:9780618642052
ISBN-10:061874252056

Houghton Mifflin, 2007

Where do you stand?

Where do you stand?
FEET: What do I stand for as a foundation of writing?
STOMACH: What upsets me about writing?
HEART: What do I love about writing?
HANDS: What do I feel about writing?
EARS: What do I hear about writing?
EYES: What do I see about writing?
BRAIN: What do I think about writing?

Welcome

Welcome to wcom2007.blogspot.com, the blog for Written Communication I, fall 2007.

Review Assignment

OAQS

For each presentation/report in each of the areas (humanities, social sciences, physical sciences), your own as well as those of your fellow students, write a brief review following the OAQS format:

1. Observation
2. Appreciation
3. Question(s)
4. Suggestions

Topic
Presentation
Review

(Start with your own)

Course text link

Written Communication -- our course textbook, The College Writer, has the following excellent web site: http://college.hmco.com/english/vandermey/college_writer/1e/students/

Links

How to Punctuate (How To Wiki)

Documentation

from: http://www.sfu.ca/criminology/termpaperstyle.htm

TERM PAPER STYLE REQUIREMENTS

Students of [social sciences] are required in most courses to write term papers, formal essays and/or research reports. Only those submissions that look and read like formal reports, term papers or essays can be marked fairly. The aim of a paper is to clearly and succinctly communicate ideas, such as the methods, results and significance of a study. Therefore, each student should have a clear idea, before writing, of what is expected by the School of Criminology.

Social scientists often report their ideas and research findings in a format outlined in the fifth edition of the American Psychological Association’s Publication Manual (2001). Legal scholars typically comply with the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation, also in its 5th edition (2002) which uses a different referencing style. Students should ensure their essays conform to the style required by their course instructor. Some basic aspects of standard report formats are presented in this summary. Its focus is on the APA style. If you adopt this referencing method, the Publication Manual should be consulted regarding details not covered here. At S.F.U., the Publication Manual is available in the Library at the Third Floor reference desk.

A RESEARCH REPORT

Research reports consist of several sections where appropriate, such as: Title Page, Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, References (and, occasionally, Appendix), which are briefly described here.

Title Page: Includes the title, your name, course number and date.

Abstract: A 100-175 word summary.

Introduction: Explains the purpose of the paper. In most cases this summarizes the theoretical importance and previous research in the area and includes a clear statement of the research hypotheses or aims of the paper.

Method: Describes the study in enough detail to permit another investigator to replicate it. The Method section is often divided into three subsections: Subjects, Apparatus or Research Instruments/Tools (if necessary), and Procedures.

Results: Summarizes the data and the statistical treatment of them. Graphs and tables should be included if they make the results more intelligible.

Discussion: Evaluation and implications of the research, including how the results support or do not support the argument; comparison of results with previous research; and problems with the research.

Appendices: Includes supplementary material not appropriate in the body of the report.

References: In the research report, all references to previous research or ideas will be accompanied by a reference citation to the original author. Students should ensure they provide a full citation in every instance, including a reference to the page from which the material being used to write your essay was obtained.

Citations of authors within a sentence take the form “Freud (1928, p. 106) contended that....” with the year in parentheses and the page number included. For sentences not mentioning the author’s name, you should put the entire citation in parentheses: “...according to social learning theory” (Bandura & Walters, 1962, p. 64). Each author’s work cited in the report must be listed in the reference section, in alphabetical order. See the additional discussion of referencing below, under the “Text” heading, in the context of formal essay writing.

The Title Page, Abstract, Introduction, References and Appendix begin on new pages. The other sections (Method, Results and Discussion) begin on the same page as the preceding section if there is space. All sections of the report are double-spaced except the references (each entry is single spaced with double spacing between).

A FORMAL ESSAY

1. A formal essay has a logically structured explanatory form that attempts to clarify a writer’s single dominant idea or thesis relevant to a specific subject in criminology.

2. A formal essay has a specific and standardized format consisting of

(a) a title page,

(b) an introduction,

(c) adequately spaced pages,

(d) a concluding section,

(e) an endnote page(s) (optional and not required if footnotes are used), and

(f) a reference page(s).

3. A formal essay, thus, has a structure consisting of a clearly recognizable introduction, developmental sections, and conclusion.

Essay FormDouble spacing is required for all materials, except indented block quotations, references cited, notes, captions, and headings. Do not break or hyphenate words at the end of lines to keep the right-hand margin regular. Essays must be typed (printed) on one side of the sheet only, on good quality paper. Pages must be 8 ½ by 11 inches (21.6 by 28 cm.). At least a one-inch margin is required on all four edges of each page. Essays must be typed or word processed.

Sections of the EssayThe sections should be ordered as follows, with pages numbered consecutively, starting with the first text page after the title page:

(1) Title page

(2) Text

(3) Endnotes (if used)

(4) References cited

Title Page Include thetitle, your name, course number, and date.

TextIf the APA referencing format is adopted, references are placed in the body of the text, not in notes. Whether paraphrasing or quoting directly from another work, you must credit the source.

• · Endnotes are confined to elaborating on points that are not appropriate to retain in the body of the text.
• · For direct quotations and paraphrased summaries of the work of others, the information that you must provide will vary depending upon whether you are citing from an electronic or a print source. When drawing on a print source, the citation is placed in parentheses, with the author’s name, followed by the year of publication of the work quoted or referred to, and the page or pages cited in the following manner: (Klein, 1988, p. 122), (Rowe, 1993, p. 115-119), or (Smith & Jones, 1991, p. 21-22). This is done following, or before each quotation (even an indented one) or any statement derived from the work of another.
• · If the author of the quotation is clear from the text, then the sentence concluding the reference should cite the year of publication and the page(s). For example:

H.L.A. Hart’s approach to law involved a critique of those earlier positive law theorists’ who viewed law as the command of a sovereign because that earlier approach failed to account for the “variety of laws” that exist (1961, p. 226).

• · Paraphrased work still requires citation to the source, including a specific page number.
  
  PDF reproductions of printed journals may be cited the same as print journals, since they typically contain page numbers. Most electronic sources do not contain page numbers, therefore alternate means are used to identify the source of the material. If paragraph numbers are given, these should be used: (Myers, 2000, ¶ 4) or (Myers, 2000, para. 4). In some cases, it may be necessary to cite to an electronic document without a specific location reference, however this will be a rare occurrence.
• · Chapters from edited books are cited to the author(s) of the chapter, not the editor of the book. Accordingly, if you rely on Richard Schneider’s chapter on “Sentencing Mentally Ill Offenders” in the book edited by Julian Roberts and David Cole, Making Sense of Sentencing, you would cite in the text of your essay to (Schneider, 1999, p. 161), not (Roberts & Cole, 1999, p. 161). If you are referring to the book as a whole, reference is made to the editors of the book. For example: “A recent effort to collect a wide range of commentary on sentencing was carried out by Roberts and Cole (1999).”

Notes: Any endnotes follow the text of the essay and begin on a new page. They are restricted to material that cannot be conveniently included in the text. Avoid, unnecessarily long notes. Notes are numbered consecutively through the text by superscript (raised) numbers.

References Cited: The text and notes are followed by References Cited—which do include any publication not cited in the text of your paper; the list is not a comprehensive bibliography of materials that you have discovered that pertain to your essay topic. The list should begin on a separate page, and all entries must be single-spaced, (double spacing between entries), listed alphabetically by last name of the first author, and chronologically, from oldest to newest, for two or more titles by the same author(s). In listing an unusual reference, include all information needed to enable a reader to identify and locate the source; when in doubt, include details. The following are examples of appropriate layout, using the A.P.A. format:

Periodical (Journal) Reference:

Atkinson, R.C., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1991). The control of term memory. Scientific American(2), 82-90.

Turk, A.T. (1996). Law, conflict and order: From theorizing toward theories. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 23(3), 282-294.

Book Reference:

Barash, D.P. (1997). Sociobiology and behavior. New York: Elsevier.

Southwell, E.A., & Feldman, H. (Eds.). (1989). Abnormal psychology: Readings in theory and research. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Schmeiser, D.A. (1988). The native offender and the law. Ottawa: Law Reform

Commission of Canada.

The entries have the following elements: author(s); year of publication; title; and source (i.e., publisher and place of publication in the case of books and reports only). Book titles are italicized; titles of articles are not enclosed with; journal titles are italicized. The journal title is followed by the volume number, then the number within the volume (or the month or season, depending upon the journal’s style), and then the page numbers. Chapters from edited books are listed by the author of the chapter, but include the editors as part of the reference:

Schneider, R.D. (1999). Sentencing mentally ill offenders. In J.V. Roberts & D.P. Cole (Eds.), Making sense of sentencing (pp. 160-172). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

If the book as a whole is also referred to in the text of your essay, then the book is listed separately in your reference list, with the editors in the author position:

Roberts, J.V. & Cole, D.P. (Eds.). (1999). Making sense of sentencing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Note that a hanging indent is used in your reference list. Accordingly, the second and subsequent lines of the reference are indented from the left margin.

CITING INTERNET SOURCES

The internet provides students with access to a wide array of resources that are not available in a print medium. Caution must be used in selecting internet sources. Since almost anyone can put up their own Web page, the quality of Web sources varies widely. Some reputable peer-reviewed journals publish on the web. Additionally, many useful government reports are available on the Web. However, many web sites contain uninformed opinion, and miscellaneous ramblings that should not be relied upon in writing a formal academic term paper. It is incumbent on the student to use only appropriate web sources, and to ensure that their instructor is willing to allow reliance on Web-based sources.

Citation styles for Internet publications are still evolving. However, printed style manuals have begun to offer considerable guidance in recent years. The current edition (5th) of The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001) gives examples for citing documents available via the World Wide Web. Sometimes reports will contain most of the information you would use in a typical non-electronic reference. In such cases, the usual format is followed, with the addition of the date the source was retrieved and the URL used to access the source, and no reference need be made to publication information if the document was not otherwise published. For example:

Chemerinsky, E. (2000). An independent analysis of the Los Angeles police department’s board of inquiry report on the rampart scandal. Retrieved January 14, 2002, from http://www.usc.edu/dept/law/faculty/chemerinsky/rampart_finalrep.html

Some reports and journals duplicate print versions of the same document, typically via a PDF document format. If page numbers are available and the print and electronic versions are the same, you are free to cite the electronic version the same as the print version. Like most references, a Web document should ideally have a title, an author, and a date, but things are not always so easy. For example, a date may not be available, in which case, (n.d.) should be used. For example:

United States Sentencing Commission. (n.d.). 1997 sourcebook of federal sentencing statistics. Retrieved December 8, 1999, from http://www.ussc.gov/annrpt/1997/sbtoc97.htm

CITING LEGAL CASES AND STATUTES

The Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001) provides an Appendix dealing with citation of legal materials. However, different conventions have arisen among legal scholars in Canada than those prevailing in the United States. Accordingly, students should adopt the common referencing format for Canadian legal materials found in the current edition (5th) of the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation (2002), modified to fit the APA format otherwise used in their papers.

Cases

Cases decided in different courts in various jurisdictions have been collected and printed in a series of law reports, and many are available electronically. When referring to a case reported in a law report series, the citation of the case is provided so that the reader may find the full text of the decision if they so desire. The full citation will be provided in a list of cases included after the references cited list. In the text, cite the name of the case (parties names italicized) and the year of the decision. For example: “In Feeney (1997), the Supreme Court of Canada addressed the power of the police to arrest a suspect in a dwelling.” Note that the Crown (Regina in Latin) is commonly a party in criminal cases, and by convention is abbreviated as in Canada. Direct quotations and references to a specific part of a judgment should identify the paragraph number where it is available: e.g. (para. 14). If paragraph numbers are not used in the case, reference should be made to the relevant page number from which the quote is drawn: e.g. (p. 3).

Following the list of references, a list headed Cases Cited should contain the full references to the cases used in the essay. This list should be alphabetical by parties to the case (in italics), and contain the year, volume number, law report, series (if any), page on which the case begins, and abbreviated court name (in parentheses) if this is not apparent from the law report. For example:

v. Feeney (1997), 7 C.R. (5th) 101 (S.C.C.)

v. Kokesch, [1990] 3 S.C.R. 3

Note that some law reports use round brackets, or parentheses, while others use square brackets. Those law reports using square brackets begin each new year with volume 1, while those using round brackets continue higher each year until the series is ended and a new series begun, at which point they will return to volume 1. Square bracket citations place a comma before the opening of the bracket, thereby showing the year to be an integral part of the law report citation. The year denotes the year of publication of the law report and may or may not coincide with the year in which the case was decided. Indeed, it is necessary to readily track down the case in such a law report to have the appropriate year in which the case was reported. Round bracket law reports use a comma after the close of the bracket. The year denotes the year in which the case was handed down, but it is not an integral part of the citation. The case could easily be tracked down with the balance of the citation, regardless of the year. Note also that the first citation contains an abbreviation for Supreme Court of Canada at the end of it. The law report, C.R. or Criminal Reports, covers cases handed down in a broad range of courts across the country, so the identification of the court is helpful in this instance. The second citation makes no reference to the court, however the law report is S.C.R., or Supreme Court Reports. This law report only publishes cases handed down by the Supreme Court of Canada. Accordingly, including the case at the end would be redundant.

Statutes

Legislation mentioned in the body of the text should be identified by the statute’s short title and italicized. Reference should also be provided in a list of Statutes Cited, appearing after the Cases Cited list, containing the statute’s citation, incorporating the jurisdiction, the year, and the chapter number. For example:

Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, c. 19.

Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-34.

Police Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 367.

Note: In law-related courses, some instructors may allow or even require you to fully conform to the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation as applied in law journals. This is a significantly different format from APA, requiring all source citations to appear in either footnotes or endnotes, with only superscript numbers appearing in the text, and no parenthetical citations of authors and publication dates. You are encouraged to look at a current Canadian law journal employing this citation style and consult the Canadian Guide to Uniform Legal Citation when writing essays with such requirements.

Academic Dishonesty

All students are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the School of Criminology’s “Statement of Intellectual Honesty”. This document is available from the general office. That document contains a summary of the University’s “Code of Academic Honesty” accessible at http://www.sfu.ca/policies/teaching/t10-02.html on the SFU Web site. In the context of essay writing, students must be particularly careful not to engage in conduct amounting to plagiarism. This occurs where an individual submits or presents the work of another person as his or her own.

• · When direct quotations are used, these should be enclosed in quotation marks and kept in the body of the text of your paper if they are less than 40 words long.
• · The author, year and page number must clearly attribute the source of the quote.
• · Longer quotes are indented from the body of the text and single-spaced. These too must be clearly attributed to the source by proper referencing.
• · Failure to use quotation marks or indent longer direct quotes may be interpreted as a form of plagiarism, even if the source of the material is vaguely identified in your paper.
• · You must include a pinpoint reference to directly quoted material and paraphrased material.
• · Paraphrasing the work of others does not make it your own; it too must be referenced to the original author, year of publication and page number.

If a source you are using makes reference to another source that you want to incorporate into your essay, you should not cite directly to that original source if you have not read the work cited yourself. For example, if Glanville Williams’ The Mental Element in Crime is cited in Simon Verdun-Jones’ text on criminal law, and you did not read the work cited, list the Verdun-Jones reference in your reference list. In the text, your citation may look as follows:

Glanville Williams considers recklessness to involve subjective foresight of risk and an unjustified assumption of that risk (as cited in Verdun-Jones, 2002, p. 123).

Your reference list would then contain only:

Verdun-Jones, S. (2002). Criminal law in Canada: Cases, questions, and the Code (3rd ed.). Toronto: Harcourt Canada.

Other Styles

Students should ultimately consult with their professor or teaching assistant regarding their preferred essay style. You may be encouraged to adopt a different style than the one presented here. In this regard, the library has prepared a useful guide to “Bibliographies and Footnotes” available at http://www.lib.sfu.ca/researchhelp/writing/biblio.pdf that will lead you through the MLA and Chicago styles of referencing, as well as the APA format.

Social Sciences Paper Guidelines

SOCIAL SCIENCE WRITING GUIDE, VICTOR VALLEY COLLEGE, DR. SUSAN MCDONALD, UCSD, DR. ERIC MAYER, VVC

INTRODUCTIONS

From: http://www.emayzine.com/lectures/writing.htm

Introductions serve to tell your reader what to expect. A good introduction gives the reader a sense that the writer is in control and that the paper will be easy to follow. The mistake students fall into most often in introductions is to try to give too much background information and then only give a vagueaccount of the focus of the paper. If you have a tendency to begin your papers with huge generalities like "Throughout human history, mankind has always…" you should realize that your reader won't be happy about (or impressed with) that kind of introduction. In general, your introductions should contain the following elements: thesis (or general claim), an indication of the narrowness of scope of your paper (which part of the topic you will address), and some indication of the structure of your paper. In short papers, these elements may all appear in one sentence while in long papers your introduction may require several paragraphs. In either case, you will need to clarify your thesis, its scope, and its structure. Think about the differences among the following statements:

TOPIC--My topic is the political economy in Africa.

NARROWING OF SCOPE--My topic is the political economy of Zaire.

THESIS--Zaire's dependence on the production and export of unrefined minerals has created an unbalanced and underdeveloped economy.

INDICATION OF PAPER'S STRUCTURE--Zaire's dependence on the production and export of unrefined minerals has created an unbalanced and underdeveloped economy characterized by unequal growth and exchange, increasing national and international debts, and neglect and suppression of Zaire's human resources.

Sample Introduction Model

The first sentence (TOPIC) only explains what the general topic will be and not what specific area or what point of view the writer will develop; by itself it is too vague.

The second sentence (SCOPE) tells us what small part of the larger topic of political economy the writer will focus on--the economy of Zaire.

The third sentence (THESIS) tells what point of view the writer will develop.

The fourth (STRUCTURE) tells what the subdivisions of the topic will be and gives us clues about what to expect as we read.

Here are excerpts from a paper that makes the common mistake of trying to cover too much background in the introduction:

Today in 1987, almost 60% of the world’s land space is considered to be underdeveloped, or a part of the Third World. Africa, Asia, and Latin America are the areas that have been ravaged by a lack of development. The problems began for these areas when the Europeans went to Africa looking for gold but: found slaves instead. Because of the slave trade, beginning in the fifteenth century, the underdeveloped countries of the world are having trouble uniting, even today.

If you were a lazy or impatient reader reading that Introduction, would you have guessed it introduced a paper about Nigeria? Here is a much more direct, focused, and therefore powerful introduction:

The nation of Zaire, even with its vast mineral resources, still remains one of the least developed or economically stable countries in the world. Ever since its emergence as an independent African nation in 1960, Zaire has been on the verge of economic collapse, supported only by increasing loans from foreign corporations and international aid organizations. Ironically, it is the continued export of copper and other minerals, long praised by traditional economists as the primary engine behind Zaire's economic growth, that prevents the creation of a stable economy. Zaire's dependence on the production and export of unrefined minerals, to the exclusion of all but subsidiary industrial activities, has created a profoundly unbalanced and underdeveloped economy, characterized by unequal growth and exchange, increasing national and international debts, and neglect and suppression of Zaire's human resources.

Use your introduction, then, to try to help the reader foresee what your point (your thesis ) will be, how much ground you will cover (your scope), and what kind of approach or what kind of support you will use in establishing your thesis. For a 3-4 page paper, your introduction may be only a paragraph; for a longer paper, you may need more than a paragraph, but make sure that you don't start your paper with paragraphs or pages of unnecessary information.

THESIS STATEMENTS

The difference between a topic (e.g., "I'm going to discuss the political economy of Zaire") and a thesis (e.g., "Zaire' s dependence on the production and export of unrefined minerals has created an unbalanced economy") is that a thesis is arguable and shows the reader that the writer has something to say. A paper that begins with a topic but no thesis gives the reader the impression that the writer is not in charge--that the writer is lost, has nothing to say, or lacks the confidence to say it. A paper that begins with only a topic gives the reader a "So what?" impression. But a paper that begins with a clear thesis gives the impression that the paper will contain an argument--that it will attempt to demonstrate something that is not already known or widely believed, that it will add something to the reader's knowledge or, whenever your reader is a teacher, that it will show you're a writer who has something to say and is capable to synthesizing knowledge. Don't feel that you have nothing to say because your teacher already knows more on the subject than you do; often you can introduce a new perspective on a subject; but even when you can't, you can at least show that you have learned to do what academics do--to synthesize information and to present a well-organized argument.

The nature of your subject will help dictate what makes a good or not-so-good thesis. Here are some examples of thesis statements from a Chinese literature paper assignment on "The Story of Ying-ying":

[1] Although their interests and abilities are similar, Chang is connected to a man's world of exams, poets, and achievements: Ying-ying's domain is limited to either her mother's household or her husband's.

[2] Throughout the story, it can be seen that Ying-ying is not the kind of woman she should be within the Confucian system, and therefore she lacks the qualities of a good wife.

If you are not familiar with the story, these sentences may look fairly similar, but anyone who has read the story will be looking for the writer's interpretation of the story's most puzzling element--why Chang courted Ying-ying and then abandoned her. Sentence (1) does not offer an argumentative thesis or claim that could help solve that puzzle; it merely states something no one would disagree on.

Sentence [2], however, answers a question ("Why does Chang desert Ying-ying and/or "What is the author's attitude toward Chang's desertion of Ying-ying?"). It promises to explain a puzzling element of the story. In literature when your assignment involves interpreting a literary work (or set of works), a good thesis statement usually answers a question about the work or explains a puzzling element in it. When you are dealing with historical or sociological material, the question you propose to answer in your paper is usually related to the conceptual issues of the course. You might think of your thesis as the answer you will give to some problem relevant to the issues of the course, a problem whose nature and scope you have defined well.

DEFINITIONS

Sometimes in your introduction or elsewhere you will need to define terms that might have different meanings for your reader. That does not mean, however, that you should quote a dictionary; most, if not all, of your teachers have read too many papers that begin "According to Webster's Dictionary,..." and they react negatively to such definitions. If you are taking a course like History 3B that focuses upon abstract terms like development, capitalism, dependency, collectivism, then your writing should implicitly reflect the richness and complexity of the discussion going on in lectures, readings, and section meetings. To resort to Webster or some other dictionary for a quick definition may make you look as if you aren't doing serious work in the course.

Much of the time, you will not need to define terms explicitly, but there are important exceptions, particularly when the terms are surrounded by ambiguity. For instance, in the Chinese literature course, there is much discussion of the tension between individualism and collectivism, so the terms are important. But shifting historical circumstances mean that the term "collectivism", for instance, can be used to describe social systems as radically different as Confucianism and communism. To write well about individualism and collectivism in Chinese literature (or history) may therefore require you to be explicit In a different way than you would have to be in using a term like "dependency theory" in urban studies or history; in the case of dependency theory, you need to know what the term means and to demonstrate that you know it, but the term does not ordinarily mean radically different things to different people. With "individualism" and "collectivism". In Chinese literature, however, you need to be explicit about how you are using the terms. Here is part of an essay on Chinese literature that uses terms in a confused way:

This paper will argue that the relation between individualism and collectivism is similar in that they both focus on their own selfish goals, whether for an Individual family or for the country as a whole. Furthermore, the stories are told in a selfish way and expect the reader to agree with the moral.

Before the Cultural Revolution, assuming that this was a much more individualistic period in Chinese history, the writers tell of stories which focus on the self. For example, in the Jewel Box story, the man in the end selfishly decides to forget about the courtesan and to pursue his career in the civil service. His desire to do the right thing was very individualistic and hence very selfish in aspect.

The problem with these paragraphs is that traditional Confucian society was collective, rather than individualistic, in subordinating the individual's needs or desires to the general family welfare. It is possible to argue that Confucian China was individualistic, but to do so successfully would require explaining what you mean by the term "individualistic " and admitting that Confucian China subordinated--even, at times, sacrificed--the individual to the good of the group. The writer has almost made this distinction by writing "whether for an individual family or for the country as a whole," but that's not good enough; more needs to be said. Furthermore, the term "selfish" hurts the argument because it literally means for the self, and the man in the Jewel Box story gives up his love for the courtesan in older to obey his father. It is possible--with difficulty--to argue that such an act is individualistic, but the term "selfish" probably makes it harder to convince a reader. The writer needed to spend more time discussing these terms in the richness of their historical complexity or else to use them in the more conventional way.

It is hard to offer a clear rule for/when definitions will be necessary; it will depend upon the circumstances in your course and your paper. The best rule of thumb, perhaps, is to offer a definition whenever (1) your reader may not know the definition (e.g., of a technical term), (2) the term is in dispute, or (3) you are using the term in an unusual way but have a good reason for doing so.

The most important parts of a paper, the thesis and the supporting evidence, must work together. The thesis determines what can be used as relevant supporting evidence; all the supporting material in the world will do you no good if it is not relevant to your thesis. At the same time, an insightful and sophisticated thesis will be of little use unless you produce evidence crucial for validating the thesis. Neither one will work without the other. The most common mistakes student writers make involve an imbalance between thesis and supporting evidence. sometimes writers think their papers have to have impressive BIG IDEAS, so they produce one impressive generalization after another and then are surprised to receive a low grade. Ironically, they may have worked harder than they needed to, trying to come up with lots of ideas when a few well-supported and clearly explained ideas would have been far more appealing to a reader.

At the other extreme, some writers feel their job to produce a lot of facts or data without venturing to assert a thesis or draw conclusions about their facts. We see this in literature courses when students give lots of detailed plot summary without connecting it to a thesis. Be see it in history or urban studies papers that become a mere catalog of dates and events. We see it in communication papers. So keep in mind this rule of thumb; you need to have a reasonable quantity and quality of evidence. The quantity of evidence will be greater than the quantity of theses--lots of evidence, perhaps a one-dimensional thesis--and you need to make sure the evidence supports the thesis you want it to support. In other words, once you have clearly introduced your thesis, most of the paper will be spent demonstrating your supporting material and explaining its relevance to the thesis or, in other words, analyzing your material.

There are three qualitative questions to ask yourself in deciding whether to use a particular piece of evidence: (1) is it appropriate, relevant evidence? (2) is the evidence concrete enough for the thesis you want to support? and (3) have you made clear to the reader why the evidence is appropriate or relevant? Not much can be said about item #1 here because what is relevant to the thesis will depend upon your thesis and the course you are taking; just remember that whatever your thesis is, you will need to support it with relevant evidence.

As for item #2, many writers fail to use evidence that is concrete enough. The following is an example from an Urban Studies 10 paper in which students were asked to discuss the lure of the city:

One reason that a big city is able to attract so many different people is that in a huge metropolitan area, there is a place for everyone. Big cities always have their share of rich, high-ranking important people, while they also have their share of homeless who live off the streets. There are a variety of different classes, races, backgrounds, and socioeconomic groups living and working together to make a city what it is. There seem to be better opportunities for everyone in a big city. Even lower-class citizens will find more blue collar jobs in a big city rather than a small town.

This paragraph is far too general; the student needed to specify what city she was talking about and what some of its specific characteristics were. After all, one of the assumptions made in the Urban Studies program is that cities are not all alike but that some kinds of cities have similar problems (and the other SAWA courses, for one reason or another, will also value specificity or concreteness). Sometimes discussion of competing theories seems to occupy center stage in the SAWA courses, but supporting evidence is still important. Here is one example from an exam on overurbanization; the student in this case successfully managed to refer to a number of specifics without having to spend a great amount of space spelling out the details:

Overurbanization is revealed through the low income of the people in such cities… There must be more than one worker in the family. Thus the women play a major role. They are the second sources of income. They collect scrap paper (Carolina in Child of the Dark), well ready-made food (Jakarta), turn to prostitution (Ethiopia), spin (Ethiopia), work in factories (Mexico), or live off each other by trading and bartering among themselves (Haiti).

Sometimes writers state their evidence without making explicit why it counts as evidence. In other words, facts often do not speak for themselves. Sometimes the writer has to make his or her causal inferences or analysis clear to the reader. Here is a part of a Communication 20 paper on media images of presidential candidates; the writer has given a lot of information but then has failed to do anything with the information.

The image of Dukakis that comes to mind is of a candidate who is at a loss when it comes to charm, charisma, and vitality. Dukakis was described in Time magazine as "The paradigm of caution who has launched not a single imaginative political theme." He was also described by one of his aides as an "earnest nerd." According to a recent poll done by Time, only 34% of those people registered to vote felt Dukakis was an exciting candidate. [Here there are 3-4 more similar examples] After reading such statements from the media, the overall feeling one gets is that of a dud. The media encourages this type of thought constantly.

Note that the writer assumes she has finished her task after producing a string of examples. She must not have realized that she was neglecting the task of analyzing, interpreting, or commenting on the examples. The commentary portion of the paragraph ("a dud. The media encourages this type of thought constantly") is weak; it is buried in the paragraph, its language is not academic ("a dud"), and we are left uncertain about what exactly "this type of thought" is that the media encourages. Here, by contrast, is a paragraph from a more experienced writer In the field of Communication, writing on a similar topic:

In order to restore the semblance of objectivity to this [New York Times] article [on the 1984 election], the author has balanced these statements with passages of complete neutrality; for example: "critics argued that the policy (of taking away welfare benefits from those who, while they were poor, were still employed) would lead many poor workers to give up their jobs and rely entirely on welfare, but there is little evidence that this has happened," and "studies have shown that the new programs have proved successful in some places and failed in others." These statements lend the article an air of impartiality while providing little in the way of information, taking no stand and serving to heighten the effectiveness of the more statistically-worded passages. They rob the article of its apparent bias.

Here the writer is focusing upon only two sample passages from one article, but he spends some time explaining what he sees in the examples he gives.

ORGANIZATIONAL OPTIONS

Most topics can be organized in more than one way, and yet often one mode of organization fits the topic better than another. For every assignment, try thinking about what the purpose of the assignment should be. Many assignments, for instance, can be translated into what, or questions. If you try to answer a what question when your TA is looking for an answer to a or question, then you won't do well. For instance, if you were given a History 17B assignment on the fiscal crisis of the cities in the 1970s, you would need to know whether your purpose should be (1) to describe what happened in the fiscal crisis or (2) to analyze why it happened. You might he asked just to describe a phenomenon accurately, without having to speculate about why it exists. Here often, however, assignments require you to analyze why or how something exists, and you won't be able to do that without also describing what it is.

The comment TAs and Professors make most often on students' papers is "more analysis needed. " That can mean a number of things depending upon the writing task. If you are not sure what it means, ask your TA or Professor. It may mean that you need to describe less and to write more about the why and how of your topic. In Communication, it may mean that you are sticking too close to surface descriptions and not writing enough about the significance of the phenomenon you describe or its relevance to one of the models of communication you have studied. In literature, it may mean that you are only describing the plot rather than developing a thesis about the plot. Because the advice to "be analytical" means so many different things in different writing situations, you should discuss it with your TA and use every opportunity to find a way or organizing your material that is appropriate to the task assigned.

In history courses, you will often have to decide about whether a narrative organizational mode would be most appropriate. Because history is concerned with change over time, students often have trouble deciding whether or not use the chronological or narrative ordering of events.

Without too much oversimplification, we can say that history writing takes place at some point on the continuum diagrammed below:

NARRATIVE ANALYSIS

At the narrative end of the continuum, history resembles a story that is strongly determined by time order. Since history (far more than sociology)is the study of change over time, narrative has long been a common way or organizing historical accounts. At the other end of the continuum, analysis (as your teachers or TAs often call it) is a form of organization in which time ordering is either almost absent or relegated to the background. Analysis means dividing some thing or phenomenon into its component parts or constituent elements. Narrative might be an effective method of organization if you were writing about how an individual came to this country--what he or she did first and then did next and then did after that--or if you were writing about the change over time in the assimilation of German immigrants, for instance, on the other hand, analysis might be a more effective method of organizing an essay about German immigrants in the first wave of immigration if you felt it was less important to trace the changes within that period than to discuss the elements (or components or variables) of the German experience. There is often a stronger narrative element in the readings for TWS/History 7A, 7B, 7C, and 25 (Chinese history) than in TWS/History 24 or 26, but rarely in history will you find an extreme of narrative without analysis or analysis without any sense of narrative in the background. Most history writing has some degree of both narrative and analysis; otherwise it would leave out something crucial to history writing.

In each of your courses, you can discuss with your TA whether narrative or chronological organization is appropriate to your subject; the decision often depends upon the topic. The following are some examples in which students have chosen narrative when analysis could have been more effective. The first example comes from the paper on Nigeria (for TWS/History 24) with the overly diffuse introduction quoted earlier. Here are the second and part of the third paragraphs--still with no mention of Nigeria:

The slave trade began in 1441 when the Portuguese brought ten Africans to Europe as curios. What started out as curiosity turned out to be one of the most economically, not to mention economically devastating problems to hit the African continent. When the Europeans came to Africa they robbed the continent of many of its natural resources: ivory, gold, palm oil, palm kernels, groundnuts, and most important, its people. These people were taken from Africa and sent to the new world where those who survived the trip would live out their lives as slaves.

The idea of slavery was not original to the Europeans; the Africans had been enslaved by their rulers for many centuries. The Africans became slaves to their rulers in a number of ways.

The writer of these paragraphs is taking too long to get to her subject (see the section above on introductions). She seems to have felt obliged to start far back in time, but the results from the reader's point of view are not good. The reader is asked to read through all this information with little idea of the scope of the paper, its thesis, or whether this information is relevant. The writer probably didn't realize that the reader would prefer to skip all the early history and get to a more focused account of Nigeria in more modern times. The paragraphs above, then, are examples of a writer's focusing too much upon chronology instead of getting to the point sooner. Narrative is not by itself a bad choice for this subject, but the reader is initially offered the wrong narrative (the brief narrative of everything that happened from before the advent of the Europeans), instead of a narrative more focused in time and in Its analysis of what happened.

Here is another example from TWS/History 24 of a writer's choosing narrative rather than non-narrative organization. At the end of this paper, the TA wrote "I think you emphasize a narrative of events to the' detriment of your analysis of the differences arising from the economic goals of the First and Third Worlds. For example, the paragraph in which you discuss Dulles' announcement contained some key ideas that you could have expanded on, such as the U.S. cotton interests and the concept of "strings attached" foreign policy. An analysis of these factors would have helped you connect your paper to the themes of development and underdevelopment." Here is the paragraph before the one on Dulles and the one on Dulles; notice how the student has chosen a narrative organization:

Nasser was now in a favorable position. He had offers from the two superpowers which he could use as a bargaining chip. In private he admitted that his first choice for funding the Aswan Dam would be the World Bank followed by the West and finally the Soviet Union. He feared becoming economically dependent on any foreign powers. The American deal included the condition that Nassau make concessions to Israel and sign a peace treaty, something Egypt, the Arab leader, could not do considering recent tensions.

Then, on July 18, 1956, U.S. Secretary of State John Foster Dulles announced the U.S. was withdrawing Its offer to finance the dam. This change in position was officially the decision that the project was economically unsound, but was really because of Egypt's growing ties with the Soviet Union, the U.S. cotton Interests, and Israeli pressure through prominent Jewish Americans. The United Kingdom and World Bank also withdrew their funding offers and Egypt was left with few options. America's "strings attached" policy of foreign aid was at times good in boycotting a despotic regime but was bad in this case because it used economic aid as a way of achieving political ends.

The topic sentences of these paragraphs indicate the narrative focus through their stress on chronological sequence "Nasser was now…Then, on July 18, 1956 . . . " It Is Important to be accurate about such facts, but the writer has in effect foreshadowed the chronology and relegated the thematic components--like U.S. cotton interests or "strings attached" foreign policy--to the background. The TA in this case suggested that the paper might be more successful if the thematic components were in the foreground instead. In a case like this where the writer is dealing with causes, it's worth asking which makes more sense--organizing the paper by the order in which things happened or taking one cause and exploring it fully before going on to another cause. It is only a matter of emphasis, but the right emphasis often makes the difference between a good paper and a mediocre one.

TOPIC SENTENCES

Topic sentences are one of the most important ways of emphasizing what you want the reader to notice. Writers often throw away chances to foreground key ideas by writing weak topic sentences. Here is a paragraph from a paper on the economic consequences of foreign mining in Rhodesia:

Contrary to popular belief, archaeologists estimate that primitive mining existed in sub-Saharan Africa as early as 43,000 BC(Lanning and Hueller,p. 28). At this time, and for centuries thereafter, the minerals were intended for local consumption and were often used in traditional rituals as body decorations. Gold was used in decorative masks, and copper became a source of currency. Until the mid-nineteenth century, African states and chiefdoms managed to preserve their mineral resources, selling only that amount which they needed to buy goods offered in trade by the Middle East. However, social conflicts, internal political evolution, the slave trade, and more importantly colonization, led to the decline in local Rhodesian mining (Lanning and Hueller 32). In the latter part of the nineteenth century, Europeans began to colonize Rhodesia with the aim of expropriating the copper and gold mines.

Because readers often look at the beginning of a paragraph to tell them where the paragraph is going, the first sentence of this paragraph is misleading. It implies that the focus may be on what's wrong with popular belief, what archaeologists are saying, or what happened in primitive mining. The writer intended to focus upon the unprecedented change occurring in nineteenth-century Rhodesia when, for the first time in their history, minerals were no longer used primarily for local purposes. That focus can be foregrounded by putting it right at the beginning of the paragraph in a sentence like the following:

In the latter part of the nineteenth century, for the first time in Rhodesian history, minerals began to be used for other than domestic purposes.

Here is an example of a weak topic sentence from Communication 20:

In an article entitled "Michael Dukakis: Earnest Competence," an image is trying to be brought to attention. One part reads "Dukakis is frugal. He buys bargain-basement clothes and switched to a cheaper brand of muffins." This tries to portray to the public an example of how within his persona life Dukakis is simple and tries to cut down spending.

The topic sentence above has two weaknesses--one stylistic and one strategic. Stylistically, an image can't to do anything. Strategically, the writer would be better off telling the reader what that image is. The topic sentence might be revised to read, "The media frequently emphasize Dukakis’s frugality." Putting the ward "frugal" or "frugality" into the first sentence of the paragraph will make the examples in the paragraph easier to follow.

In history (as we have already seen above), the temptation to emphasize chronology or narrative often leads writers to write topic sentences devoid of important thematic or analytic points. In a History 17A paper on Frederick Douglass's political experience, one student began a paragraph by writing "in 1832, Douglass went to work for Thomas Auld." There is nothing wrong with such a sentence, but a stronger sentence can be written to combine the chronological information with thematic analysis:

When Douglass went to work for Thomas Auld in 1832, he found that with his new freedom of mind he could no longer easily act as a slave.

This sentence accomplishes several things; in the first (the main) clause, it alerts the reader to the next chronological phase in

Douglass's career; and in the second (the main) clause, it foregrounds the thematic analysis which is more important than when Douglass when to work or whom he went to work for. The most important point is that at a turning point in his life Douglass rejected slavery. That is the point that deserves all the emphasis the writer can give it.

Similarly in literature classes, good topic sentences can help make the difference between a paper that strongly supports a thesis and a paper that appears to provide little more than plot summary. Here are some topic sentences from literature papers that do no more than state a fact:

In the literary text, "The Festival of the Bullets," Guzmán relates and experience he had as Villa’s private secretary.

The stories are narrated by different people.

The majority of the action takes place in Don Justo's corral, but Rulfo opens the story with an earthy, beautiful scene of fog laid back against the town of San Gabriel.

Each of these sentences leaves the reader asking "So what? why is this fact important?" If the topic sentence does a good Job of advancing your thesis, it won't leave your reader with that feeling. Here are some topic sentences that foreground thematic points:

The stream of consciousness narration of 'Macario' is another vehicle through which to understand the boy’s mind.

The fact that Jones was actually physically present in El Salvador makes his theme credible and clear--he was not merely talking to people on the phone and relying on hearsay.

TRANSITIONS AND OTHER CUES FOR READERS

Most of the successful topic sentences and paragraphs quoted here have clear transitions that tell the reader how to read. Writers do well to assume their readers will be easily bored or frustrated without clear signals--e.g., signals of how part B is related to part A, phase 4 to phase 3, statement x to statement y, and so on. Any good textbook on writing will offer you a list of transitions; what is most important in choosing transitions is to keep stressing what you want to stress. If you want to focus on the chronological change, a transition like "In 1832" is useful. If you want to emphasize the thematic element also, in an example like the sentence about Frederick Douglass, then you may want to write something like this:

This acceptance of his lot, however, was to change when Douglass discovered a freedom of mind.

Here the underlined words help stress the contrast between Douglass's old and new attitudes. Whatever the subject you are writing on, you can find words like nexthoweveralsofor example that will help you make clear to the reader how each successive part of your paper is related to the previous part and what the reader is to expect of the part that is to come.

USING SOURCES

In using sources, you need to think about both your PURPOSE for using sources and the MECHANICS of doing so.

PURPOSE--Your purpose should be to support an argument that belongs to you. Don't think of using sources as a way of letting you off the hook so that you don' t have to think or have an argument of your own. Don't think of them as a way of dressing up your prose. If it helps, think of yourself as a lawyer putting together your evidence be f ore a court; the argument is yours, but some of the evidence is not yours. Anything that is not yours, you will need to handle carefully by doing the following:

1. Cite each source so that readers or other writers can verify or pursue your ideas. (On the mechanics of this, see below.)

2. Make sure you clarify how each source is relevant to your argument; don't assume the evidence will speak for itself because it won’t. You need to interpret your evidence or its significance for the reader. In the case of quotations, that means you will usually need to introduce each quote and provide some explanation after it.

MECHANICS--There are many different styles for citing sources. For undergraduates, the three most common ones are the old HLB style (which uses footnotes), the new MLA style ( which uses parenthetical citations in the text), and the APA style (which uses parenthetical citations in the text in a manner different from the new HLA style). You need to choose a style that your teacher approves of and then follow it scrupulously and consistently.

If you are not certain which style to choose, ask your teacher. If you can't ask your teacher, try using the new HLA style for literature courses, the old MLA--or footnote--style for history, and APA style for the social sciences. Any library will carry a number of books that will show you the exact ways of using one or more styles. You can refer to chapter 21 of The St. Martin's Guide to Writing for help with either the new HLA style or the APA style.